Otter.ai vs Fireflies.ai for checked meeting notes

Choose by capture and handoff constraints. Otter Basic has monthly minutes and lifetime file-import limits. Fireflies Free has 400 total storage minutes per seat; its Free help page lists three meeting transcriptions by default and requires Auto Join to unlock unlimited transcription for supported meetings. Check the exact capture, export, sharing and AI limits. No accuracy winner is measured here.

Decision pointOtter.aiFireflies AI
Best suited toCapturing a meeting, reviewing its transcript, and turning verified discussion into a short recap and action list.Teams that search meeting records and route reviewed summaries into follow-up work.
Plans and costBasic is free. The monthly selector shows Pro at US$16.99 per user/month; annual views display multiple discounted amounts, so verify the annual price in checkout before quoting it.The Free plan lists 400 minutes of total storage per seat. Transcript and media downloads require a paid plan.
LimitationsBasic allows 300 transcription minutes per month, 30 minutes per conversation, and three lifetime audio/video imports; Basic exports text as TXT only. Otter lists six transcription languages, with Simplified Chinese and German marked beta on its Help page.Free storage is a total per-seat allowance, not a monthly reset. Desktop Take Notes does not save replayable media.

Choose by the job

Trade-offs that change the choice

CheckOtter.aiFireflies AI
Free allowance shapeBasic: 300 transcription minutes monthly; three lifetime file imports; 30-minute maximum conversation.The current Free help page lists three meeting transcriptions by default; Auto Join unlocks unlimited transcription for supported meetings. Storage is 400 total minutes per seat, with separate AI-feature limits.
Handoff formatsBasic can export TXT only; paid access adds formats such as DOCX, PDF, and SRT. Verify role and shared-conversation export permission.The download guide lists PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, JSON, and Markdown; check the account's current download and branding options before relying on them.
Language and reviewPricing lists transcription for English, Spanish, French, German, Japanese, and Chinese. Review names and mixed-language turns against audio.Pricing advertises transcription in 100+ languages. Treat that as a vendor-published capability, not an accuracy guarantee for your speakers or terminology.
What a trial can establishA short, consented sample can reveal where a transcript needs correction; this page contains no recorded test.A short, consented sample can reveal whether upload, search, and recap flow meet your process; this page contains no recorded test.
Sharing riskExport options depend on plan and access rights for shared conversations.A public recap link can expose the transcript to anyone with the link; choose a restricted sharing scope and confirm the audience.

Run your own like-for-like check

This is a proposed evaluation protocol. No new head-to-head product run is reported here.

  1. Write down the actual output: live notes, transcript, audio, searchable archive, action list, or captions. Remove any meeting that is not approved for testing.
  2. Check each plan's recording minutes, per-meeting duration, file-import limits, storage, language needs, AI-summary allowance, and export format.
  3. Use the same short, consented audio file or the same typed fictional fixture; note the plan, date, source format, and settings.
  4. Compare corrected words, speaker labels, uncertainty, and exported file content against the original. Do not rate a tool from its marketing claims.
  5. Select a service only after checking meeting access permissions, archive access, retention, costs per seat, and any manually required import or export steps.

Record these outcomes

Take the comparison into a workflow

Sources for these trade-offs

Use the same input

Fictional typed fixture for a future, consented test: Asha commits to sending an outline Thursday; Ben offers to review after receipt but gives no date; Carla says a fee is undecided. Run the same approved audio or text and require no invented deadlines.

What a successful result must preserve

Check word and speaker fidelity; whether conditionals stay conditional; names, numbers, and negations; owner and date extraction; editable transcript and audio export formats; monthly minutes, file imports, storage, summary limits, and who can access a recap.

Evidence and test status

Official specification comparison using the vendors' current plan and help pages. The shared fixture is an evaluation protocol, not a product run, transcription benchmark, or measured result. Obtain participant permission before any real recording and manually verify names, numbers, and decisions.

Open interactive comparison →