SEO.ai vs SEO GPT

SEO.ai and SEO GPT are not the same kind of product. SEO.ai is a done-for-you SEO autopilot: the current record's official pricing page (reviewed 2026-11-02) lists Single Site $149/month for one website in one language and Multi Site $299/month, covering content-gap analysis, publication planning, article writing, internal links, featured images, auto-publishing and a backlink exchange. SEO GPT is a free AI content tool hosted on an agency services page (seovendor.co/seo-gpt); no paid tier price appears on the reviewed tool page, so the previous draft's claim that both list paid plans is withdrawn. If you want the whole content operation run for you and can pay the premium, SEO.ai is the match; if you want free AI help drafting SEO-shaped copy, SEO GPT is the no-cost starting point. Check the official sites for the latest plans. We did not run a hands-on test on either tool; no quality winner is declared.

Decision pointSEO.aiSEO GPT
Best suited toBusiness owners who want SEO done for them by an AI agentContent creators who want free AI help writing SEO-optimized content
Plans and costOfficial pricing page reviewed 2026-11-02: Single Site $149 per month for one website in one language; Multi Site $299 per month for multiple websites or languages; the site offers a 7-day trial.Official tool page reviewed 2026-11-02: SEO GPT is presented as a free AI content tool; no paid tier price appears on the reviewed page.
LimitationsThe 7-day trial terms and per-language coverage were not fully verified; agency-comparison claims are vendor claims, and no authenticated product test was run.The page is an agency services page hosting the free tool, so tool limits and model details were not verified, and no authenticated product test was run.

Use the same input

Your team needs AI-written product descriptions that target specific keywords.

What a successful result must preserve

SEO feature depth (keyword data, briefs, scoring), writing modes, team seats, pricing model.

Evidence and test status

Specification comparison against the current tool records. We did not run a hands-on test on either tool; no quality ranking is claimed.

Open interactive comparison →